Recommendations are independently chosen by Reviewed's editors. Purchases made through the links below may earn us and our publishing partners a commission. Prices were accurate at the time this article was published but may change over time.
The Acer Nitro XV282K KV is a high-end gaming monitor with broad appeal. Its excellent color accuracy and wide gamut make it a great choice for most content creators.
Read More
The Gigabyte M27U ups the contrast and brightness from the older M28U while lowering the price and beating out the Acer Predator XB283K KVbmiipruzx.
Read More
Dell’s S2721QS is a superb 4K monitor for most people, but it’s got a refresh rate of 60 Hz, so it’s less than ideal for gamers and content creators.
Read More
This larger, 32-inch 4K monitor from BenQ falls a bit short of the 27-inch model in contrast ratio and HDR performance, but it still offers a detailed and realistic image. It has a long list of ports and can charge a connected laptop over Thunderbolt 3 or USB-C.
Read More
Lower prices, improved image quality, and better support from both Windows and macOS make it a great time to buy one of the best 4K monitors—especially since they’re becoming the new standard.
These monitors provide an awesome improvement in sharpness that’s just as useful while web browsing or watching 4K movies or playing games. Though 1080p 24-inch gaming monitors can reach higher refresh rates for smoother gameplay, some 4K displays are now reaching comparable speeds.
Our top pick is the Acer Nitro XV282K KV
(available at Amazon for $446.99)
, a 28-inch 4K monitor marketed to gamers but that can handle much more. The XV282K KV has a high refresh rate and HDMI 2.1 support, which makes it great for both PC and console gamers. Yet it also has a wide color gamut and superb color accuracy, both of which appeal to creative professionals. It’s so good that it could be overkill for some people, so we also tested a range of more affordable 4K monitors.
Best Overall
Acer Nitro XV282K KV
The Acer Nitro XV282K KV is a 28-inch 4K monitor with a 144Hz refresh rate and AMD FreeSync support. It also supports HDMI 2.1, so it can handle 4K/120Hz gameplay from an Xbox Series X or PlayStation 5. The monitor is VESA DisplayHDR 400 certified and uses an IPS panel to deliver exceptional image quality and viewing angles.
The screen looks sharp and crisp, and it has outstanding color performance including spot-on color accuracy and a very wide color gamut. This adds up to vibrant, lifelike images. Although marketed primarily to gamers, the XV282K KV’s color performance makes it perfect for professional content creators.
The biggest flaw is a mediocre contrast ratio that leads to a hazy, dull look in dark scenes. The HDR is bright enough to add pop to some HDR scenes, but it’s not a huge upgrade over SDR.
This monitor is not the most affordable, but it does outperform most monitors in its price range, especially for gaming. Acer achieves this by making a few cuts to build quality. The XV282K KV has a sturdy stand that adjusts for height, tilt, and swivel, but the monitor’s design is plain and its construction is merely functional.
The Gigabyte M28Uused to be the best 4K gaming monitor you could pick up for around $500. Although it’s an inch smaller, the Gigabyte M27U is an improvement over its predecessor in almost every way, while costing slightly less. It’s 100 nits brighter (400 max compared to 300), has a max refresh rate of 160Hz up from 144Hz, and a VESA Display HDR600.
The M27U is also the first Gigabyte monitor we’ve reviewed with serviceable HDR performance. Although it’s only rated for only up to 600 nits, highlights still pop in games and there’s a noticeable difference with it enabled. Sadly, due to the M27U’s sub-1000:1 contrast ratio, shadowy areas can look crushed together and lose fine detail. It’s not terrible, especially for the price, but you might be a bit disappointed if you’re expecting OLED-level blacks.
Where the M27U doesn’t disappoint is in the added features. At around $500 (even less on sale), it includes speakers, 3 USB-A 3.2 ports, a USB-C port with 18 watts of power delivery, and, most impressively, eschews a power brick. Many newer $1,000 gaming monitors, like the LG UltraGear OLED 27GR95QE-B, lack most of, if not all of these features.
The M27U is a great option if you want to dip your toes into 4K gaming without spending twice as much on a top-of-the-line monitor. Even if you only play slower-paced deckbuilding or strategy games, the additional pixel density makes character art and fine details sing.
While many 4K gaming monitors can either cost upwards of $700 or stick with a basic 60Hz refresh rate, the Gigabyte M28U puts out a 4K/144Hz image signal and sometimes, can be found as low as $450 on sale. It’s not just a high resolution on offer, though: the M28U also has a wide color gamut that it displays accurately, with rich colors that make HDR content look great. The M28U’s peak brightness with HDR enabled isn’t mind-blowing at just 453 nits, but affordable monitors are rarely able to offer much in this regard.
The sharp visuals of 4K are just half of what the Gigabyte M28U delivers. With a 144Hz refresh rate, gameplay appears smooth and FreeSync Premium Pro can prevent screen tearing. Even some fast monitors have pixel response times that lag behind, leaving blurry ghosting trails behind moving imagery, but the Gigabyte M28U’s pixels largely keep up with the action, making for exceptionally clear visuals, for the price.
There are competent challengers in the market of 1440p gaming monitors as well as 4K gaming TVs, but as far as 4K monitors go, the Gigabyte M28U stands out as a strong value option that tops the competition.
The Dell S2721QS is a 27-inch 4K monitor with an IPS panel. It has a 60Hz refresh rate, supports HDR, and is among the least expensive 4K monitors available.
Despite its price, the S2721QS provides great image quality in a wide range of content. It has a high maximum brightness, superb sharpness, and good overall color performance. Its contrast ratio is near the top of IPS panels, so it looks better in dark scenes than most similar monitors.
The monitor supports HDR input but it’s only “HDR Ready” instead of VESA DisplayHDR certified. That’s a bit surprising because, in our tests, it performed better than some monitors that are certified. Don’t get too excited, however. While it can add vibrance to HDR content, it’s only a modest improvement over SDR.
Unfortunately, this monitor doesn’t support adaptive sync, which will probably disappoint gamers who prefer smooth, fast-paced gameplay. It’s still a great choice for games with a slower pace, such as strategy or simulation titles.
This is a sleek, modern monitor that looks great on a desk and feels sturdy despite the low price. It ships with a quality stand that can adjust for height, tilt, swivel, and even rotate 90 degrees.
The BenQ PD3220U is a 32-inch 4K monitor designed for professional use. It has a 60Hz refresh rate, supports HDR, and uses an IPS panel. It also has a USB-C Thunderbolt 3 port with power delivery that can charge a compatible laptop. The monitor’s additional USB-A ports make it useful as a USB hub.
As the name implies, the PD3220U is similar to the smaller PD2725U. It shares the smaller model’s top-tier color accuracy, very wide color gamut, and excellent sharpness, all of which make it a great monitor for professional content creation.
However, the larger PD3220U suffers a lackluster contrast ratio that falls behind most competitors. This hurts the monitor’s depth and realism when using it for entertainment.
The monitor supports HDR but at only 250 nits is nowhere near bright enough to properly display HDR content. You’re better off sticking with SDR.
This monitor is simple but handsome and feels expensive when handled. It has a stand that adjusts for height, tilt, and swivel, but it can’t pivot due to its size.
Asus’ ROG Swift PG32UQX has cutting-edge technology that represents the future of computer monitors. It is a 32-inch 4K monitor with a mini-LED backlight that includes 1,152 individual dimming zones, each of which can turn on or off independently. It’s VESA DisplayHDR 1400 certified and has an IPS panel.
The monitor has great color accuracy and a very wide color gamut, traits that are obvious in movies and games but also useful for content creators. The mini-LED backlight offers the best contrast ratio of any we tested.
Motion clarity is strong, too, thanks to the 144Hz refresh rate and Nvidia G-Sync support. That’s good news for gamers, who are the monitor’s target audience. On the downside, it lacks HDMI 2.1. It can still handle 4K/120Hz when connected to the Xbox Series X, but not with the PlayStation 5.
HDR performance is where this monitor leaps ahead of the pack. It has a maximum peak brightness of over 1400 nits and its sustained brightness was the second-highest of any monitor we tested. It also beats many HDR televisions. HDR content is so vivid you’ll all but feel the heat of on-screen explosions.
Build quality is outstanding. The monitor feels luxurious, with a robust, sturdy, wide stand that adjusts for height, tilt, and swivel. But it’s also so large and heavy that you may have trouble finding space for it on a small desk.
The P32UQX has just one serious problem: price. You could purchase three of our top picks, the Acer XV282K KV, for the price of Asus’ ROG Swift P32UQX. That’s hard to justify, but those willing to open their wallets will enjoy an unparalleled visual experience.
Content creators should take note of the Asus ProArt PA32UCX-PK, which also has mini-LED technology. It trades a high refresh rate and adaptive sync for extra connectivity and even better color accuracy. We were not able to test it for this guide, however.
The Asus ROG Strix XG43UQ is a 43-inch 4K monitor with a 144Hz refresh rate and a VA panel. It is VESA DisplayHDR 1000 certified.
Since the ROG Strix XG43UQ is much larger than a typical 4K monitor, it can be used as an HDTV replacement in a small room or studio apartment. Asus leans into this and the monitor has not one but two HDMI 2.1 ports that can handle 4K/120Hz gameplay from an Xbox Series X or PlayStation 5. It’s even compatible with AMD FreeSync.
The monitor’s VA panel provides an outstanding contrast ratio, good color performance, and a wide color gamut. Movies and games tend to look great on this monitor, but vibrant and bright content stands out the most.
This monitor’s extremely high maximum brightness can deliver a serious punch in HDR content. However, it lacks a mini-LED backlight like that found in the Asus ROG Swift PG32UX, so HDR content can struggle when very bright objects are placed against a dark background.
Although similar in size to a small television, the XG43UQ will remind you that it’s a monitor. It has obvious bezels and is thicker than many HDTVs. The wide stand is more stable than many televisions but lacks the adjustment you might expect from a monitor; it can only adjust for tilt.
The Samsung S80A is a 27-inch 4K monitor with an IPS panel. It has a 60Hz refresh rate and does not support adaptive sync. A 32-inch model is also available, but we only tested the 27-inch version.
This monitor’s highlight is its excellent color gamut and good color accuracy. Though not the best we tested in these areas, its overall performance was outstanding given the S80A’s mid-range price. The monitor also has a solid contrast ratio for an IPS panel. These traits make it a great choice for content creators and creative professionals on a budget, as the S80A’s image is slightly more accurate and realistic than the Dell S2721QS.
Samsung’s monitor falls short in brightness. This leads to lackluster HDR performance. You won’t see the punchy, vibrant image expected of HDR content.
The S80A, like Dell’s S2721QS, does not cater to gamers. It has a standard 60Hz refresh rate and does not support AMD FreeSync or Nvidia G-Sync.
Build quality is average for the price. The S80A’s stand is a bit less sturdy than that of competitors and the basic, matte black design could be more attractive. It strikes back with connectivity, however, as it provides multiple USB-A ports and a USB-C connectivity.
The Asus VP28UQG is a 28-inch 4K monitor with a TN panel. It has a 60Hz refresh rate and supports AMD FreeSync. At the time of this writing, this was the least expensive option available.
Low pricing comes at the cost of everything else. The VP28UQG scored poorly in all our objective test metrics including brightness, contrast ratio, color gamut, and color accuracy. Its color performance was especially lackluster and significantly decreased image quality. Colorful photos, movies, and games look dull and unrealistic. The viewing angles were extremely bad, too. Simply moving a few inches in your chair can cause a noticeable shift in colors.
The build quality is disappointing. The monitor looks fine but feels light and cheap in hand. It has a disappointing stand that only adjusts for tilt and isn’t tall enough to place the monitor at a comfortable viewing angle. The stand is wobbly and the screw used to secure it did not seem properly seated, which made it difficult to tighten.
Asus’ pricing can make the VP28UQG seem attractive, and this monitor is currently a top seller on Amazon, but we recommend that you skip it without hesitation.
Image quality is a monitor’s most important trait. An outstanding monitor will deliver a strong contrast ratio, pixel-perfect sharpness, a wide color gamut, high color accuracy, good uniformity, and enough brightness to appear vivid in a typical home office. Most monitors fail to achieve strong results in every area, but those that do provide a realistic, vibrant experience.
We test image quality objectively with Datacolor’s SpyderX Elite monitor calibration tool. It provides detailed tests that can gauge how a monitor performs against industry standards. If this sounds a bit too complex, however, don’t worry. You don’t need to get into the weeds of color accuracy and contrast ratios to purchase a great monitor. We’ve done the work for you.
Our objective tests are paired with real-world use that includes everything from Microsoft Word to Netflix streaming and PC gaming. This step lets us detect small flaws that don’t turn up in our objective tests.
We also judge monitors on design, build quality, and ease of use. Most modern monitors do well in these areas, but budget options occasionally stumble.
What Size 4K Monitor Do I Need?
24 inches: A handful of 24-inch 4K monitors exist, but we don’t recommend purchasing them. 4K resolution on a 24-inch display can lead to issues with older apps that do not scale properly on pixel-dense displays. The selection is slim, too, so you may not be able to find a monitor that supports the features you want.
27 inches: A 27-inch monitor is a perfect size for most people. 4K resolution looks sharp at this size, but most apps scale well enough to remain usable. Monitors of this size are also more affordable, so you can purchase a great 4K monitor at a low price. Some 4K monitors are available with a 28-inch screen, but the size difference is not enough to be noticeable.
32 inches: Especially popular for gaming monitors, a 32-inch monitor is too large for most desks. However, a 4K 32-inch monitor can make sense as a replacement for televisions in small rooms and may appeal to gamers who want an immersive, in-your-face experience.
43 inches: 43-inch monitors are becoming a rival to small televisions. Most 43-inch 4K monitors are designed for gamers and outpace the gaming-focused features available on televisions in this size. A 43-inch monitor can be too large for a desk but it can make sense if you need a display to use with a PC and game console in a small room.
The Three LCD Panel Types: IPS, VA, and TN
Most monitors use an LCD panel that sits in front of an LED backlight. The type of LCD panel technology used by a monitor has a big impact on its image quality. There are three major panel types that you’ll find in modern monitors. Each has strengths and weaknesses.
IPS: This means "in-plane switching." The most popular type of display panel for 24-inch and 27-inch monitors, IPS panels are known for providing a bright, vibrant image with a very wide color gamut.
Modern IPS panels can also offer a high refresh rate for smooth and responsive gaming. IPS struggles with contrast, however, which can lead to a dull, hazy look in dark content.
VA: This means "vertical alignment." VA is known for delivering the best contrast ratio of any LCD panel. This provides a better sense of depth and realism and is great for movies, streaming, and gaming. VA panels often aren’t as bright or vibrant as IPS at a given price point, but it’s close.
VA panels have poor viewing angles that can make them disappointing when you’re not sitting directly in front of the monitor. They also tend to have a lower refresh rate than IPS competitors.
TN: This means "twisted nematic." TN technology is an aging choice that trails IPS and VA by every metric of image quality. Motion clarity is one exception, though modern IPS panels tend to outperform TN in this area. TN panels are inexpensive, however, so you’ll often find them in budget monitors.
Want more general help in buying the right kind of monitor? Check out our guide to buying a monitor.
What is Refresh Rate?
A monitor’s refresh rate is the number of times it updates the image each second. This is generally expressed in hertz (Hz). A 60Hz updates the image 60 times each second, while a 120Hz monitor updates 120 times each second.
Increasing the refresh rate improves motion clarity, which means objects that move across the screen will be more clearly defined. It can also reduce input lag, providing a more responsive feel when using your PC.
The refresh rate is not important for day-to-day use and primarily targets gamers. An improved refresh rate can lead to a smoother, more connected feel that’s especially helpful in fast-paced games.
What are AMD FreeSync and Nvidia G-Sync?
AMD FreeSync and Nvidia G-Sync are adaptive sync standards that allow a monitor to synchronize its refresh rate with the framerate of your PC’s video output. This eliminates problems like stuttering and screen tearing that occurs when your PC’s video output differs substantially from your monitor’s refresh rate.
Adaptive sync, like refresh rate, primarily targets gamers. Windows and macOS desktops can easily output video at a rate that matches your monitor’s refresh rate. This only becomes difficult in games, which tend to vary substantially in frame rate and can easily fall out of step with a monitor’s refresh rate. Adaptive sync was developed to fix this problem.
AMD FreeSync and Nvidia G-Sync are designed to work with AMD or Nvidia graphics solutions. In truth, these standards are not exclusive. An AMD FreeSync monitor can work with Nvidia video cards or vice versa.
With that said, most monitors only offer official support for one of these two standards. We recommend that you buy a monitor that officially supports the standard that matches your PC’s graphics solution.
What is HDR?
HDR stands for High Dynamic Range. HDR content has more color and luminance data than SDR content. This provides a brighter, more vibrant image with added detail in extremely dark and bright scenes.
HDR technically does not refer to a specific standard and is instead used as shorthand for a variety of standards. With monitors, the term HDR almost always refers to the HDR10 standard. HDR10 is an open-source standard for HDR content that any company can use.
Other standards like Dolby Vision HDR are popular among televisions but not found in monitors (yet).
At its best, HDR can deliver an unquestionable boost in image quality that’s obvious when viewing HDR content. However, it can only perform its best when viewed on a very bright, high-contrast display, and most monitors aren’t up to the task. Budget and mid-range televisions face these issues, as well.
That’s not to say you should skip HDR. It’s becoming a standard feature, especially among 4K monitors, and it can deliver a more vibrant, colorful image on many monitors we tested. Just keep your expectations in check.
The product experts at Reviewed have all your shopping needs covered.
Follow Reviewed on Facebook,
Twitter,
Instagram,
TikTok,
or Flipboard for the latest deals, product reviews, and more.
Matthew S. Smith is a veteran tech journalist and general-purpose PC hardware nerd. Formerly the Lead Editor of Reviews at Digital Trends, he has over a decade of experience covering PC hardware. Matt often flies the virtual skies in Microsoft Flight Simulator and is on a quest to grow the perfect heirloom tomato.
Jonathan is an Electronics Editor for Reviewed specializing in gaming gear and has experience with everything from controllers to benchmarking the latest GPUs. He was previously the Web Editor at The Architect's Newspaper.
Our team is here for one purpose: to help you buy the best stuff and love what you own. Our writers, editors, and lab technicians obsess over the products we cover to make sure you're confident and satisfied. Have a different opinion about something we recommend? Email us and we'll compare notes.